Tuesday, December 8, 2009
Baaaaad Thoughts
While Twittering this morning I came across a report that brings scientific evidence to the proposition that bad thoughts cause bad outcomes. DO NOT have these thoughts, or have as few of these thoughts as you possibly can.
Tuesday, November 24, 2009
Reading Books on Teeny Screens: Good Idea or Health Hazard?

I attended a Medical Library Association-sponsored webcast last week, "Cutting the Cord: connecting to our Mobile Users". It was about providing electronic content to users via their mobile devices such as iPhones, PDAs and other handhelds. One thing I was surprised to learn was that people are actually reading books on devices with little bitty screens such as iPhones and iPod Touchs. I can understand Kindles and Netbooks, but iPhones?
Just to prove how ridiculous the idea was I went to the iPhone app store and installed both Amazon's Kindle and Lexcycle's Stanza (both free apps) and downloaded a book (free, of course) from each to see how I liked it. Surprise...I liked it! I don't particularly like reading on my desktop monitor, but this is different, and I'm not sure why. Now I can read books on my iPhone while I'm on Muni trying to ignore the shootings and muggings. Just have to remember not to read while driving. Someone might video me and put it on YouTube.
Wednesday, October 28, 2009
Health Journalism and the Patient Safety Movement
UCSF's own Robert Wachter has published another well-written, thought-provoking commentary, this time on the contribution that the media makes in the patient safety effort. Titled "The media: an essential, if sometimes artibrary, promoter of patient safety", it appears in AHRQ's Morbidity & Mortality Rounds on the Web and includes an interview with Charles Ornstein, Pulitzer prize-winning health care journalist.
Especially interesting to me was Ornstein's explanation of how health care reporters get their leads and how good journalists provide balance and perspective (how bad is this compared to other hospitals?) as well as just getting the facts straight on what are often very complex topics.
Especially interesting to me was Ornstein's explanation of how health care reporters get their leads and how good journalists provide balance and perspective (how bad is this compared to other hospitals?) as well as just getting the facts straight on what are often very complex topics.
Thursday, October 22, 2009
Front Lines
I visited one of our primary care clinics today with the goal of showing the physicians and nurse practitioners how to register for our Loansome Doc service, a full text document delivery service that's built into PubMed. As long as I don't get too long-winded (a temptation) I'm well received during these visits because what is being offered is a quick, easy-to-use service at no charge to the individuals or their clinics. Gotta like it.
Here's a secret: although I make clinic visits under the guise of registering clinicians for Loansome Doc, I always manage to propagandize a bit for some of our other library services, including my absolute all-time favorite resource: Da-da...DynaMed. Click the DynaMed link on our home page to take a look.
DynaMed is a point-of-care tool that is in a good position, I think, to knock off the current king of the hill, UpToDate. Unlike UTD, DynaMed has clearly explained graded levels of evidence, great navigation, clickable reference links to full text articles AND a very usable version for PDAs, including smart phones. Not to mention the fact that it costs approximately 1/10th of what an UTD site license costs. If you are a SFGH clinician and would like to get access to DynaMed, please contact me, jgraham@sfghdean.ucsf.edu. I'll send you the information you need to get started.
Oh yes, this post was supposed to be about Loansome Doc. You can contact me at that same email address if you want to register for Loansome Doc.
Here's a secret: although I make clinic visits under the guise of registering clinicians for Loansome Doc, I always manage to propagandize a bit for some of our other library services, including my absolute all-time favorite resource: Da-da...DynaMed. Click the DynaMed link on our home page to take a look.
DynaMed is a point-of-care tool that is in a good position, I think, to knock off the current king of the hill, UpToDate. Unlike UTD, DynaMed has clearly explained graded levels of evidence, great navigation, clickable reference links to full text articles AND a very usable version for PDAs, including smart phones. Not to mention the fact that it costs approximately 1/10th of what an UTD site license costs. If you are a SFGH clinician and would like to get access to DynaMed, please contact me, jgraham@sfghdean.ucsf.edu. I'll send you the information you need to get started.
Oh yes, this post was supposed to be about Loansome Doc. You can contact me at that same email address if you want to register for Loansome Doc.
Wednesday, October 7, 2009
Blame vs. Accountability
This week's New England Journal of Medicine contains an article by UCSF's Robert Wachter about the delicate balance between the "no blame" approach and the sometimes overlooked need for physician accountability in regards to patient safety issues. The authors suggest that because physicians are not hospital employees they are subject to only weak enforcement of safety standards. Not wanting to alienate physicians and lose the business they bring in, hospitals have been reluctant to play the enforcer.
Citing the "no-blame" approach as the wrong tool for mature patient-safety practices, Wachter and co-author J. Pronovost (Johns Hopkins) get down to brass tacks by suggesting the circumstances under which physicians should be chastised for lack of adherence to patient safety practices and giving specific punishments such as loss of privileges and education for specific transgressions.
I imagine this article will generate a few letters to the editor, but because it bridges the gap between theory and practice, it's a valuable contribution to patient safety literature and a good starting point for further discussion.
Citing the "no-blame" approach as the wrong tool for mature patient-safety practices, Wachter and co-author J. Pronovost (Johns Hopkins) get down to brass tacks by suggesting the circumstances under which physicians should be chastised for lack of adherence to patient safety practices and giving specific punishments such as loss of privileges and education for specific transgressions.
I imagine this article will generate a few letters to the editor, but because it bridges the gap between theory and practice, it's a valuable contribution to patient safety literature and a good starting point for further discussion.
Wednesday, September 16, 2009
Looking for computer software textbooks?

I was looking for how-to manuals for Microsoft Access recently when I discovered that UCSF has licensed a database called Safari Books Online
" over 8,000 vetted learning and reference resources from leading publishers like O'Reilly Media, Addison-Wesley, Peachpit Press, Apress, Manning and Talented Pixie"
The collection focuses on computer technology and also includes graphic design, and business management titles. You can browse by category or search for books on everything from Adobe Photoshop to Unix. From the Safari website: http://search.safaribooksonline.com/home, you can read and even download chapters from any computer on the UCSF network or thorough your VPN@UCSF remote access account.
You can also find links to these online books by searching the UCSF Library catalog by keyword. Example: search keyword 'photoshop' - look for [electronic resource] in your search results. You can also search by title and use the
option on the results page to limit your search to "Online Books"Now, I really have no excuse not to learn how to use Photoshop.
Thursday, August 27, 2009
Senator Ted Kennedy and good endings
I just read this article in the NYT and it got me thinking :
08/27/us/politics/27year.html
The Kennedy family's contributions to policies and impact on the lives of all Americans are profound and will shape the stories we tell about what it is to be a "good" American for years to come. With the death of both Eunice and Ted this month,I 'm glad to see so much media attention being paid to their positive examples of public service as a reminder that 'government' is not a four letter word.
What struck me about this article were the specific details about what a good death meant to Senator Kennedy, sailing, dinner parties when he felt up to it, eating mocha chip ice cream and watching James Bond movies with his wife. Yes, he was the 'Lion of the Senate' but he was also a simple human who found comfort in the same things we all do. Even without the money, influence and prestige he enjoyed, most of us have someone who will bring us ice cream and watch a movie with us. No one is exempt from suffering but luckily most of us can find enjoyment in small things.
I also like that the article pointed out that having brain cancer gave Ted Kennedy time to be with his family and say goodbye, time to work on his memoir and receive appreciation from his colleagues and friends. Of course it's in comparison to the untimely assassinations of his his two brothers; still this is the first time I've seen death by brain cancer mentioned with a positive slant in the mainstream media, as something other than a dread and terrifying monster of a disease.
I'm glad Senator Kennedy got his "storybook ending" even as I know that the living of it for him was something different, more messily human than the story, but no less grand.
After Diagnosis, Determined to Make a ‘Good Ending’
By MARK LEIBOVICH
Published: August 27, 2009
From the time his brain cancer was diagnosed 15 months ago, Senator Kennedy spoke of having a “good ending for myself.”
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/The Kennedy family's contributions to policies and impact on the lives of all Americans are profound and will shape the stories we tell about what it is to be a "good" American for years to come. With the death of both Eunice and Ted this month,I 'm glad to see so much media attention being paid to their positive examples of public service as a reminder that 'government' is not a four letter word.
What struck me about this article were the specific details about what a good death meant to Senator Kennedy, sailing, dinner parties when he felt up to it, eating mocha chip ice cream and watching James Bond movies with his wife. Yes, he was the 'Lion of the Senate' but he was also a simple human who found comfort in the same things we all do. Even without the money, influence and prestige he enjoyed, most of us have someone who will bring us ice cream and watch a movie with us. No one is exempt from suffering but luckily most of us can find enjoyment in small things.
I also like that the article pointed out that having brain cancer gave Ted Kennedy time to be with his family and say goodbye, time to work on his memoir and receive appreciation from his colleagues and friends. Of course it's in comparison to the untimely assassinations of his his two brothers; still this is the first time I've seen death by brain cancer mentioned with a positive slant in the mainstream media, as something other than a dread and terrifying monster of a disease.
I'm glad Senator Kennedy got his "storybook ending" even as I know that the living of it for him was something different, more messily human than the story, but no less grand.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)