Blame vs. Accountability

This week's New England Journal of Medicine contains an article by UCSF's Robert Wachter about the delicate balance between the "no blame" approach and the sometimes overlooked need for physician accountability in regards to patient safety issues. The authors suggest that because physicians are not hospital employees they are subject to only weak enforcement of safety standards. Not wanting to alienate physicians and lose the business they bring in, hospitals have been reluctant to play the enforcer.



Citing the "no-blame" approach as the wrong tool for mature patient-safety practices, Wachter and co-author J. Pronovost (Johns Hopkins) get down to brass tacks by suggesting the circumstances under which physicians should be chastised for lack of adherence to patient safety practices and giving specific punishments such as loss of privileges and education for specific transgressions.



I imagine this article will generate a few letters to the editor, but because it bridges the gap between theory and practice, it's a valuable contribution to patient safety literature and a good starting point for further discussion.